Call for Climate-Smart 
Energy Decisions


Nathan Blades says an oil disaster in the Nova Scotia offshore has the potential to wipe seafood businesses like his off the map.

Read Nathan's story → 

When the Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling rig sank in 2010, it spewed raw oil into the Gulf of Mexico for months, wreaking untold damage on marine life. The spill was the largest ever in U.S. waters, and the full effects are still unknown.

The thought of a disaster like that one happening off Nova Scotia shores keeps Nathan Blades awake at night. With good reason: Blades is the general manager of Sable Fish Packers, on Cape Sable Island in southwest Nova Scotia – a seafood packing, processing and exporting company his grandfather founded in 1946 that today specializes in herring, hagfish and lobster.

“We worry about a potential disaster here and what it could do to the seafood business, which is a huge contributor to the Canadian and Nova Scotia economy [to the tune of $1.8 billion annually],” he says. “Because of the ocean currents off Nova Scotia, and the Bay of Fundy tides, an oil spill in some areas currently under exploration would be pushed up into the Bay of Fundy, washed onto the shores and then deposited back out into the Gulf of Maine.”

So Blades was initially encouraged about the newly tabled Bill C-69, which aims to restore the environmental assessment process gutted by the Harper government in 2012. This month, the federal government is accepting feedback from Canadians before moving the bill forward. However, one piece of Bill C-69 raises alarm bells for Blades and his colleagues: instead of improving impact assessments, draft legislation gives industry-dominated offshore petroleum boards even greater powers than they have now, as they will be able to sit on reviewing panels assessing projects for major offshore oil and gas projects.

Environmental regulations should spur change, not disasters

Tell the government they’ll win back trust when the 
Canadian Energy Regulator Act:


Insists on a diverse, fair, expert board of decision-makers, with Indigenous representation

 Upholds domestic and international climate commitments 

Respects the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

Right now the federal government is making critical decisions about the fate of key laws that protect Canada's environment: the Impact Assessment Act, Canadian Energy Regulator Act, the Canadian Navigable Waters Act and the Fisheries Act.

For the next few weeks, the government is listening to Canadians about what we want for our country's future. You can help make sure there are strong laws in place that protect our land, air and water; keep future generations healthy; and make it possible for Canada to respond to climate change and meet Paris Agreement commitments.

Copyright © 2018. All rights reserved. Lead photo: Robert Breckenridge / CC-NC-ND. Icons: Retinaicons, Alberto Miranda, A. Maslennikov, Z. Najdenovski, Vectors Market, Freepik

Environmental laws Canadians can be proud of

That’s a conflict of interest, says Blades. “My experience with the offshore petroleum boards is that they haven’t done a very good job of fulfilling their mandate to protect the environment,” he says. 

For instance: the Nova Scotia board has ignored requests from the seafood industry for measures that would disallow oil-and-gas exploration in or near fragile seafood-fish nursing grounds such as the Browns, LaHave, Roseway and Georges Banks. One area being considered for exploration encompasses Lobster Fishing Area 40, a lobster nursery and designated Marine Protected Area off East Dover where harvesting is prohibited. The board has also declined to ban the use of chemical dispersants on oil spills (which the seafood industry believes poses a significant risk to marine species), and neglected to require rigs to keep capping stacks – equipment that can stem gushing wellheads in a disaster – nearby and ready to deploy in case of a blowout.

“The Deepwater Horizon rig was a model for the industry. It was not supposed to fail. However, a series of human errors took place and it exploded and fell into the ocean, and there was oil spewing from an out-of-control wellhead for months,” says Blades. As a result of Deepwater, blowout-prevention technology has been improved. But Blades would rather see strong environmental regulations spur change, not disasters.

“An oil disaster in the Nova Scotia offshore has the potential to wipe our industry off the map. I want to see due diligence and a strong, prescriptive regulatory regime implemented up front so that we’ve done our best to prevent a disaster from occurring,” says Blades. “And if there is a disaster, we’ve given ourselves a chance to survive it as an industry.”

Requires meaningful public participation & independent expert analysis

Makes decision-making transparent and accountable

Creates an independent data agency

Make your call to Minister Carr today

Right now on Parliament Hill, the environment committee is making critical, lasting decisions about the way projects like tar sands, pipelines and offshore drilling are approved.

The Canadian Energy Regulator Act – introduced as part of Bill C-69 – is meant to restore public trust in the way oil and gas projects are approved. But, it doesn't address many concerns.

As BP drills in deep water off Nova Scotia and right whales swim into Canadian waters for another perilous season, we're hearing that our work on bringing to light dangerous flaws in ocean protection in our current offshore oil regime may be working!

But more pressure is needed to make real change. We can't leave things in the hands of offshore boards made up of industry insiders. You’ve gotten us this far. Let’s get this bill fixed!

Please tell Minister Carr, Minister of Natural Resources, the proposed Canadian Energy Regulator Act needs to go further to adopt principled, accountable energy decisions that will protect Canadians and our communities for generations to come.

Here are some talking points for your call.

Tell Minister Carr you're a voter who's counting on him for a stronger, better Bill C-69 that:

  • Is committed to meeting Canada's domestic and international climate promises.
  • Guarantees Canadians have a chance to ask in-person questions about proposed oil and gas projects.
  • Doesn't give more power to offshore petroleum boards regarding seismic testing and offshore drilling.
  • Respects the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Sierra Club Canada Foundation, PO Box 2007 STN B, Ottawa, ON, K1P 5W3

Now's Canada's chance to restore public trust in the way energy projects, like tar sands and pipelines, are approved